New Research Shows Immune System Destroyed After Second Booster

A new study has found that a second COVID booster could have a catastrophic effect on the immune system. Published just before the new year, the Chinese study found that mice who received four or more doses of the mRNA shots designed to combat SARS-CoV-2 experienced discernibly reduced immune function.

The reduced immune function not only inhibited the mice’s ability to combat COVID-19, but it weakened their natural ability to fight other viruses and bacteria. In fact, the very building blocks of the human immune system may be at risk.

This is an important finding, as the results could mean that those receiving boosters are destroying the innate immune function that is their first line of defense against illness. 

The researchers don’t mince their words, saying:

“Our findings demonstrate potential risks with the continuous use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters, providing immediate implications for the global COVID-19 vaccination enhancement strategies.”

The authors acknowledged that policies that promote a second booster – or even annual boosters – are being made despite the fact that “scant information” is available. This is a major reason why they chose to conduct their study: to determine the “protective efficacy and potential adverse effects” of the mRNA shots, which the authors say remains “largely unknown.”

The socio-political divide surrounding the newly deployed mRNA technology has focused on 2 things:

1. Do they work?
2. Are they safe?

Arguments ranging from travel restrictions to school mandates come down to the cost-benefit analysis of taking the shots. As far as efficacy is concerned, all of the available data indicates that the so-called vaccines are wildly ineffective at stopping infection or transmission (the only two metrics by which mandates and restrictions could possibly be justified).

Large epidemiological studies keep showing that mRNA jabs have “negative efficacy” against the coronavirus. In other words, people who received them are more likely to become infected than those who were never vaccinated.

For example, A study conducted by the Cleveland Clinic and published in December 2022 found that “the higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19.” [You can find the full study here.]

On January 12th of this year, an expansive French study set out to determine the effectiveness of a second mRNA booster compared to a single booster or previous infection. By every metric, the study found that a second booster was less effective than the first. Even worse, people who received a second booster were actually more likely to be infected than those who hadn’t. 

As you can see from the chart below, people who receive a second mRNA booster are more likely to be infected with COVID-19. By 6 months, that infection risk is already 30% higher than their single-boosted counterparts.

Adjusted relative vaccine effectiveness of the second booster of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, compared to those who received the first booster dose 181-210 days previously, against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 infection among ≥60 years and older. Error bars = 95% confidence intervals of the estimates.

Demonstrating the waning efficacy (and potentially increased risk of infection) should – at the very least – put an end to discussions of mandated boosters. But what about the safety of these shots? Is it possible that governments, corporations, and the manufacturers themselves have knowingly or negligently done irreparable harm to a large swath of the population by coercing injection of this untested product?

Unfortunately, this new study suggests that the answer is “yes.”

The scientists injected mice with several doses of purified spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD). The RBD is the most crucial part of the coronavirus spike protein. It attaches to the receptors on our cells that allow the virus to dump its payload into them.

BioNTech and Pfizer initially considered targeting it alone for their mRNA vaccine before deciding to make a broader version that would cause our cells to make the entire spike. The RBD-only version was called BNT162b1, as opposed to BNT162b2, which ultimately became the version BioNTech and Pfizer sell today.

The team found that 4 or more doses seemed to exhaust the immune system of the mice, not only in the targeted antibodies but in the B- and T-cells that form the very foundation of the innate immune system. 

I cannot stress how important it is to understand the role of B- and T-cells in the immune system. Without them, it becomes nearly impossible to survive.

Both are types of lymphocytes, which circulate in your blood and are part of your immune system. B-cells produce antibody molecules that can latch on and destroy invading viruses or bacteria. T-cells are direct fighters of foreign invaders and also produce cytokines, which are biological substances that help activate other parts of the immune system.

Without B-cells, your body would not be as effective at fighting off a number of common bacteria and viruses; and you would lack the long-lasting “memory antibody” function that is typical after recovering from an infection. 

Without T-cells, every exposure to pathogens like bacteria, fungi, and viruses could be life-threatening.

As shown in the charts below, extended immunization inhibited the production of RBD-specific memory B cells.

Again, the study’s authors did not mince their words:

“When we administrated additional doses of the same vaccine booster, with the attempt to induce a similarly enhanced or at least sustained immune response, we observed an overt reduction of the overall immune responses.”

Your body’s innate immune system is the most important line of defense against illness and disease. A strong immune response can literally be the difference between life and death when encountering bacteria and viruses as seemingly innocuous as the common cold. 

If the SARS-CoV-2 shots targeting spike protein RBD can indeed destroy the building blocks of the human immune system, mankind could be facing a pandemic that would make COVID-19 seem like child’s play. Hundreds of millions could perish as every virus and bacteria tears through communities. 

It is important to note that we do not know if this same immune response exists in humans. However, the mice the researchers used are genetically altered to model accurately the human response to the coronavirus and have “been shown to share profound similarities with humans in response to SARS-CoV-2 infections,” as the paper explains.

This is not alarmism. This is not sensationalism. There is a very real threat of severe adverse outcomes due to shots that have already been administered over 13 BILLION times to a population of less than 8 billion people. There are more than enough safety signals to support the immediate suspension of these shots pending more extensive, long-term safety data. 

The future of mankind may depend on it.