TTAC is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
This week, a congressional investigation discovered that several major baby food brands contained “dangerous levels” of toxic heavy metals. At least 7 companies in the $8 billion baby food market were implicated.
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, who chairs the house Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy within the Committee on Oversight and Reform, said that “these manufacturers knowingly sell baby food containing high levels of toxic heavy metals… It’s time that we develop much better standards for the sake of future generations.”
The manufacturers guilty of poisoning our children include some big names. The 7 companies investigated were:
- Gerber (owned by Nestle)
- Plum Organics (owned by Campbell Soup)
- Sprout Organic
- Earth’s Best Organic
- Happy Baby
- Parent’s Choice (Walmart’s private label brand)
The heavy metal contaminants found in the baby food are among the most dangerous, and include:
Unfortunately, the companies under investigation were largely uncooperative, and have categorically denied wrongdoing so far.
Lies vs. Facts
Nurture Inc., which makes Happy Baby, said it only sells products that have been rigorously tested and don’t have contaminant ranges outside the FDA guidelines. “We can say with the utmost confidence that all Happy Family Organics products are safe for babies and toddlers to enjoy,” said a spokesperson. But the investigators found that over 25% of the Happy Baby products that the company tested contained over 100 parts per billion of inorganic arsenic.
Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp. said it tests each delivery of ingredients, including fruits, vegetables and rice, for up to 255 contaminants to ensure they meet internal quality standards. But investigators found that Beech-Nut tested and used 57 ingredients, such as cinnamon and sweet potatoes, that contained over 20 parts per billion of lead.
Other companies refused to cooperate with the investigation, blocking the committee from properly testing their products. Walmart (Parent’s Choice), Sprout Organic Foods, and Campbell (Plum Organics) all tested positive for “concerning levels of toxic heavy metals” in independent testing. The investigators said they were “greatly concerned that their lack of cooperation might obscure the presence of even higher levels of toxic heavy metals in their baby food products, compared to their competitors’ products
Poisoned Babies: By the Numbers
The following is a breakdown if the specific toxic metals found in each brand and the maximum levels of each toxin:
- Arsenic (90 parts per billion)
- Lead (48 parts per billion)
- Cadmium – 75% of their carrots tested for excess cadmium (87 parts per billion)
- Mercury – Gerber does not test for mercury in their products
- Arsenic (180 parts per billion)
- Lead (641 parts per billion)
- Cadmium – 65% of products tested for at least 5 parts per billion
- Mercury (10 parts per billion)
Earth’s Best Organic
- Arsenic (180 parts per billion)
- Lead (352 parts per billion)
- Cadmium – at least 102 different ingredients tested positive up to 260 parts per billion
- Mercury – Earth’s Best Organic does not test for mercury in their products
- Arsenic – Beech-Nut routinely uses high-arsenic additives to address issues like “crumb softness” (913 parts per billion)
- Lead – at least 629 ingredients ranging from 20 to 887 parts per billion
- Cadmium – at least 102 ingredients ranging from 20 to 102 parts per billion
- Mercury – Beech-Nut does not test for mercury in their products
Experts agreed that the presence of these toxic heavy metals is a major issue. “This is an endemic problem that’s been swept under the rug and never addressed,” said Tracey Woodruff, director of the program on reproductive health and the environment at the University of California. “It speaks to the many areas that we need [the] government to be active in,” she added. “Consumers can’t figure it out on their own.”
“These numbers are striking,” said Sung Kyun Park, co-director of the University of Michigan’s occupational epidemiology program. “If children are getting served this every day, the cumulative effects could be substantial.”
Rui Hai Liu, professor of food science at Cornell University, is conducting research for the Baby Food Council, a coalition the industry formed two years ago to work on reducing contamination. “These naturally occurring contaminants present in vegetables and fruits can be especially harmful to young children in terms of their organ development and neurological development,” he said.
And while it’s true that trace amounts of heavy metals can be present organically in some soil, many of these products tested positive for inorganic heavy metals, likely resulting from reckless agricultural practices and additives used to increase margins and make products more marketable.
The True Risk of Toxic Heavy Metals
Children’s exposure to toxic heavy metals causes permanent decreases in IQ, diminished future economic productivity, and increased risk of future criminal and antisocial behavior. Babies’ developing brains are exceptionally sensitive to injury caused by toxic chemicals, and several developmental processes have been shown to be highly vulnerable to chemical toxicity.
The fact that babies are small, have other developing organ systems, and absorb more of the heavy metals than adults, exacerbates their risk from exposure to heavy metals.
Exposure to heavy metals at this developmental stage can lead to untreatable and frequently permanent brain damage, which may result in reduced intelligence, as expressed in terms of lost IQ points, or disruption in behavior.
For example, a recent study estimates that exposure to environmental chemicals, including lead, are associated with 40,131,518 total IQ points loss in 25.5 million children (or roughly 1.57 lost IQ points per child)—more than the total IQ losses associated with preterm birth (34,031,025), brain tumors (37,288), and traumatic brain injury (5,827,300) combined.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has ranked known toxic substances based on the threat they pose to human health. Here’s where each of the toxins present in baby food rank, and some of the primary health risks:
Inorganic Arsenic – #1 on the ATSDR list
The known health risks of arsenic exposure include respiratory, gastrointestinal, hematological, hepatic, renal, skin, neurological and immunological effects, as well as damaging effects on the central nervous system and cognitive development in children.
Studies have concluded that arsenic exposure has a significant negative effect on neurodevelopment in children. This negative effect is most pronounced in Full Scale IQ, and more specifically, in verbal and performance domains as well as memory. For every 50% increase in arsenic levels, there is an approximately 0.4 decrease in the IQ of children.
A study of Maine schoolchildren exposed to arsenic in drinking water found that children exposed to water with an arsenic concentration level greater than 5 parts per billion showed significant reductions in full scale IQ, working memory, perceptual reasoning, and verbal comprehension scores. The authors pegged 5 ppb as an important threshold.
Likewise, a study of children in Spain found that increasing arsenic exposure led to a decrease in the children’s global motor, gross motor, and fine motor function scores. Boys in particular were more susceptible to arsenic’s neurotoxicity.
Lead – #2 on the ATSDR list
Even small doses of lead exposure are hazardous, particularly to children. Lead is associated with a range of bad health outcomes, including behavioral problems, decreased cognitive performance, delayed puberty, and reduced postnatal growth. According to FDA, lead is especially dangerous to infants and young children.
The FDA acknowledges that: “High levels of lead exposure can seriously harm children’s health and development, specifically the brain and nervous system. Neurological effects from high levels of lead exposure during early childhood include learning disabilities, behavior difficulties, and lowered IQ. Because lead can accumulate in the body, even low-level chronic exposure can be hazardous over time.”
Lead exposure severely affects academic achievement in children. Even at low levels, early childhood lead exposure has a negative impact on school performance. Two separate studies of schoolchildren in Detroit and Chicago public schools found a strong inverse relationship between lead exposure and test scores. In the Detroit study, there was a “significant association” between early childhood lead exposure and decreased standardized test performance, with lead exposure strongly linked to an adverse effect on academic achievement.
The Chicago study found that higher blood lead concentrations were associated with lower reading and math scores in 3rd grade children. Increased blood lead concentrations correlated with a 32% increase in the risk of failing reading and math.
Mercury – #3 on the ATSDR list
Studies of mercury’s effect on childhood development have primarily been conducted by considering the mother’s exposure to mercury while pregnant. In these instances, prenatal mercury exposure has been consistently associated with adverse subsequent neuro-development.
Prenatal mercury exposure is also related to poorer estimated IQ.27 Beyond prenatal exposure, higher blood mercury levels at 2 and 3 years of age were positively associated with autistic behaviors among preschool-age children.
Cadmium – #7 on the ATSDR list
Cadmium is associated with decreases in IQ, as well as the development of ADHD. A 2018 study found that cadmium exposure negatively affected children’s Full Scale IQ, particularly among boys. Boys exhibiting higher amounts of cadmium exposure had seven fewer IQ points than those exhibiting less cadmium exposure. A 2015 study similarly found a significant inverse relationship between early cadmium exposure and IQ.
A 2018 study linked cadmium exposure to ADHD, finding that the disorder was more common among children with the highest levels of cadmium exposure as compared to a control group. Most importantly, cadmium is an established human and animal carcinogen. Studies show that cadmium increases risk for lung, kidney, breast, and prostate cancers.
As usual, we’ve learned that these companies don’t give a rodent’s hindparts about consumer safety. The food that they market to our young children is laden with some of the most toxic elements on earth, and the response from the corporate world is that their “standards” are better than anyone else.
It just isn’t true.
To learn more about the health risks of these heavy metals, check out these clips from Mike Adams’ presentation at TTAC LIVE! 2017.
Heavy Metal Poisoning: Are You at Risk?
Can Heavy Metals Make You Feel Good? Cadmium and Mercury Dangers
Corporate greed and a lack of accountability have allowed these companies to go unchecked as they literally poison our babies. It is our mission to provide the best information for you to protect your family. Our children are precious and most in need of protection. If we don’t look out for them, it seems no one will.
Toxic overload is one of the leading causes of cancer. The Truth About Detox can help activate your body’s natural cancer-fighting system.
Click here to learn more.
Follow, Subscribe, & SHARE:
1. Telegram: https://t.me/TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines
2. GAB: https://gab.com/TyCharleneBollinger
3. GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/cancertruth
4. TruthSocial: https://truthsocial.com/@TheTruthAboutCancer
5. CloutHub: https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/TheTruthAboutCancer
6. Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/vX3lcHH4Dvp0/
7. Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/TheTruthAboutCancerOfficial
8. Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/thetruthaboutcancer
Very Concerning says
Please also see this very concerning research.
There is a very noticeable gap out there, in environmental /industrial chemical testing, research, knowledge (this is an entire field of medicine that is barely known/taught in medical school). Consumer protection laws are not existing or adequate. Many chemicals have been used by industry and released into general population use/exposure in products – “grandfathered” in without adequate testing.
Is is imperative that a protective and preventative set of rigorous laws and accountability stance be taken nationally and globally – to create people/health/safety/consumer protective laws that are not “self regulated” by industry – and truly protect all – including/especially the most vulnerable among us – babies and children
BODY BURDEN: THE POLLUTION IN NEWBORNS
The Pollution in Newborns
A BENCHMARK INVESTIGATION OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS, POLLUTANTS AND PESTICIDES IN UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD
Environmental Working Group, July 14, 2005
Summary. In the month leading up to a baby’s birth, the umbilical cord pulses with the equivalent of at least 300 quarts of blood each day, pumped back and forth from the nutrient- and oxygen-rich placenta to the rapidly growing child cradled in a sac of amniotic fluid. This cord is a lifeline between mother and baby, bearing nutrients that sustain life and propel growth.
Not long ago scientists thought that the placenta shielded cord blood — and the developing baby — from most chemicals and pollutants in the environment. But now we know that at this critical time when organs, vessels, membranes and systems are knit together from single cells to finished form in a span of weeks, the umbilical cord carries not only the building blocks of life, but also a steady stream of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides that cross the placenta as readily as residues from cigarettes and alcohol. This is the human “body burden” — the pollution in people that permeates everyone in the world, including babies in the womb.
In a study spearheaded by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) in collaboration with Commonweal, researchers at two major laboratories found an average of 200 industrial chemicals and pollutants in umbilical cord blood from 10 babies born in August and September of 2004 in U.S. hospitals. Tests revealed a total of 287 chemicals in the group. The umbilical cord blood of these 10 children, collected by Red Cross after the cord was cut, harbored pesticides, consumer product ingredients, and wastes from burning coal, gasoline, and garbage.
This study represents the first reported cord blood tests for 261 of the targeted chemicals and the first reported detections in cord blood for 209 compounds. Among them are eight perfluorochemicals used as stain and oil repellants in fast food packaging, clothes and textiles — including the Teflon chemical PFOA, recently characterized as a likely human carcinogen by the EPA’s Science Advisory Board — dozens of widely used brominated flame retardants and their toxic by-products; and numerous pesticides.
Of the 287 chemicals we detected in umbilical cord blood, we know that 180 cause cancer in humans or animals, 217 are toxic to the brain and nervous system, and 208 cause birth defects or abnormal development in animal tests. The dangers of pre- or post-natal exposure to this complex mixture of carcinogens, developmental toxins and neurotoxins have never been studied.”
Does anyone know of anything that might help parents whose 4 year old son has just been diagnosed with DIPG brain tumor?
Fotini Taylor says
Excellent article! I did hear a news report many years ago, regarding children who were fed Gerber as infants were at greater risk of being diagnosed with one form or another of childhood cancer. After reading your article, and my own personal account (I was fed Gerber baby food and then at 9 years, was diagnosed with T-Cell leukemia), I truly believe that there is a great accuracy in the information that is selectively not shared with us.
Alberto Osorio says
What are the safe alternatives?
Hi Ty. Hi Charlene. Could you please make The Truth About Detox a free viewing event? This looks absolutely fantastic! Everybody needs to watch this.
Rochelle Stewart says
How do you know the foods you purchase in the store to prepare your own baby food is free from these toxins as well since so much of our soil, even if it is labeled organic is full of toxins.
Amanda Signor says
What can we do? I know we fed our baby Earth’s Organic Formula from 6 months to 1 year. I am devastated about this.
Silvia Logan says
It is not too surprising when the babies become bigger, they have behavioral problems and learning disabilities which all the toxins which they were exposed by being breastfed and which were found in their baby food.
Thanks for info. Just wanted to let you know Pinterest has blocked you from being able to pin from this site. 🙁
This is shocking but not surprising. We are bombarded by heavy metals throughout our lives, and thus it is important that we do our best to move them out of our body as safely as we can.
I have been consuming the Medical Medium heavy metal detox smoothy every morning for over a year, and recently began to also take Pure Body Extra Zeolite spray 3 times a day. Here is the link https://mindbodyhealth.thegoodinside.com/ And of course, I try to only eat organic fruit and veg.
maria machelski says
Could you please tell us what brands DO NOT contain these heavy metals and are safe for our children? This makes me so angry. I have a pantry full of Gerber baby food. I plan on boxing it up and taking it back to the grocery store or mailing it to Gerber & demanding a refund! What can we do to help stop this crime? First I plan on making this article known to as many parents as I can. Thanks for keeping us informed.