TTAC is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
Video Transcript: Cancer Cover-up? The Low Dose Chemotherapy Alternative Your Oncologist Isn’t Telling You About
Ty Bollinger: Now what do you think about the IPT, the IPTLD, the targeted low dose?
Dr. Murray Susser: I think IPT is a good option.
Ty Bollinger: Okay.
Dr. Murray Susser: I’ve seen people who had exhausted everything in conventional medicine and conventional chemotherapy, conventional everything. And they [doctors] always give that little phrase, “go home and get your things in order.”
Ty Bollinger: Sure.
Dr. Murray Susser: You know that’s a real doctor-y thing.
Ty Bollinger: Yeah.
Dr. Murray Susser: And with the IPT, a lot of these people, instead of getting their things in order, took IPT and got a lot of good results and a good quality of life. IPT is insulin-potentiation therapy. Now they’re calling it low dose chemotherapy.
Ty Bollinger: IPTLD, sure. Can you describe what is IPTLD; what is the low dose IPT?
Dr. Murray Susser: Well, the low dose IPT, the low dose therapy, has to do with fooling the cancer cells. Cancer cells eat sugar at about 19 times the speed of healthy cells. And cancer cells are voracious for sugar, which you should say that’s one of the good management aspects of treating cancer patients is take them off every drop of sugar, not a speck.
But with IPT what you do is you give insulin and insulin lowers the blood sugar. You just get the right amount of insulin and you give it, and you lower the blood sugar below its normal range of about 90 or 100-mg percent. And when it gets down to 40 range, you get really sick. I mean you feel sick. It’s not dangerous, but it feels terrible. It gets dangerous when you get down to around 20 or 10 or zero. But at 40, it’s not dangerous but it’s quite unpleasant.
And what’s happening is it’s unpleasant for the cancer cells. It’s more because they’re starving. And cancer cells are really good at selecting out chemotherapy. They won’t take chemotherapy but they will take sugar. And when you take away all the sugar then the cancer cells will take anything. That’s kind of like someone dying of thirst on the ocean in an ocean raft and they drink salt water. They know it’s not good for them and it kills them. But the cancer cells then will take the chemotherapy instead because they can’t get sugar.
Ty Bollinger: Okay.
Dr. Murray Susser: And that gives a tremendous benefit therapeutically. And the numbers are really fantastic on that because the IPT gives you 200 percent, 200 or 300 percent therapy with 10 percent of the toxicity. You give a tiny dose of chemotherapy at the therapeutic moment when the blood sugar reaches 40. And you give the IV chemotherapy.
Ty Bollinger: And so that’s more of a selectively toxic treatment towards the cancer cells than just blasting the whole body with chemo.
Dr. Murray Susser: Exactly. That’s exactly the way to put it.
Ty and Charlene have been on this mission together to reach as many people around the world with the truth that saves lives as they can, and they need your help! As you know, they are being censored with many other truth tellers.Please support their mission by sharing this article! Next, you can support them by going to www.thetruthaboutcancer.com and signing up for their FREE Newsletter!Also, join Ty & Charlene on Alt Social Media platforms where the TRUTH is allowed and join the discussion there!Follow, Subscribe, & SHARE:
1. Telegram: https://t.me/TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines
2. GAB: https://gab.com/TyCharleneBollinger
3. GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/cancertruth
4. TruthSocial: https://truthsocial.com/@TheTruthAboutCancer
5. CloutHub: https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/TheTruthAboutCancer
6. Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/vX3lcHH4Dvp0/
7. Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/TheTruthAboutCancerOfficial
8. Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/thetruthaboutcancer
I have been recently diagnosed with breast cancer, stage 1c, grade 3, not in lymph nodes. Core biopsy and tumor pathology show weakly ER positive , but Oncotype came back high risk and indicated ER negative (which would make me triple negative). I do not want the regimen of chemo that oncologist is recommending for many reasons. I am desperate for a treatment to complement radiation and the Arimidex that has already been prescribed. Please help.
Karin,
The best advice we can give you is to consult with one of the doctors/experts that we interviewed in our Global Quest Series. Here is a link to get their information: https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/experts-info-sheet/
Wishing you all the best!
Hi my wife was diagnosed breast cancer stage 1 grade 3 triple e negative we went ahead with mastoctomy 4 weeks ago cancer wasn’t spread in her lymph node nor in her second breast but oncologist offering her to take 12 weeks of chemotherapy through research and all she spent want to go ahead with chemotherapy treatment and try natural remedies we have about 10 days to give yes or no about chemotherapy is there any way some one can advice pros and cons in this situation? As we can’t come to conclusion awaiting reply
Hi Ilyas,
The best advice we can give you is to consult with one of the doctors/experts that we interviewed in our Global Quest Series. Here is a link to get their information: https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/experts-info-sheet/
My wife has battled Large B-Cell Lymphoma for nearly 11 years. Believing some of the hype and lies, we went with traditional chemotherapy (R-CHOP) at first. My wife went through permanent physical damage because of it along with the usual hair loss and sickness. She has never recovered her full health. The cancer went away, but she remained sickly. A few months later, we met a nurse that (secretly, worried about job) told us of a clinic that used high-dose intravenous vitamin C (IVC) for cancer treatment, and they cured her cancer. We went there, and my wife received numerous treatments and her health improved dramatically. Later, the cancer returned after 3.5 years, so we went directly to the vitamin C treatments, and the cancer disappeared. It returned twice more over a 7 year period, and twice more the vitamin C resolved the problem.
However, last summer (2022) it returned with a vengeance and the vitamin C was no longer enough. To get a PET scan to see what was happening, we had to include an oncologist (quackologist). So, we enlisted the same quack from ten years earlier. The doctors at the Vit-C clinic sent him the medical records. All this quack did was ridicule us for using “alternative” methods. It was unbelievable. I only wanted the images so we could leave this guy in the dust. The cancer was stage 3A and visible from neck to pelvis. My wife was in trouble. This quackologist offered a worse chemotherapy (R-ICE) than before. Our answer was no. We asked about alternatives — he gave none. The alternative was to go home and die. We were given two months. My wife was down to 83 pounds and she could not even walk any more.
Through an act of God answering prayer, we learned about IPT, and started treatments right away. That was six months ago, and my wife is practically cancer free. No side effects. The treatment center also uses many methods to build up her immune system, including IVC, saunas, light therapy, coffee enemas, lymphatic massage, various vitamins, etc. — they treat many things at once. My wife is up and about, and carrying on daily chores, etc. — We are not yet done, although the results so far are extremely encouraging.
One last note, because we are not pursuing the usual cabal cancer treatments, my “health insurance” will not pay anything. It is all “out-of-pocket” for us. Oddly, the treatment costs are about 20% of the usual chemotherapy that insurance would cover. In other words, the treatment that my wife is receiving cost considerably less the “traditional” chemo, but insurance will not cover any of it. That exposes a lot.