Most Americans today are constantly connected to the world of digital information via smartphones and other mobile devices. An estimated 95% own a cell phone of some kind, while 77% own a smartphone – which currently operates on 4G technology.1,2
According to tech experts, at least a hundred telecom operators all over the world are preparing to make the switch to 5G technology, which is expected to be fully rolled out by 2020. It will be needed to run the 28 billion devices estimated to be online by 2021.2 Before we proceed, let’s understand what all these “Gs” mean and what 5G is designed to do.
What is 5G and What Will It Do?
The “G” in 3G, 4G, and 5G stands for “generation.” The first wireless phone technology marked the appearance of the first generation. Later, 2G started when people were able to send text messages between their phones.
The advent of 3G allowed people to make calls, text, and browse the internet using their phones, while 4G provided faster wireless access and better connectivity. Long-term evolution (LTE) gave 4G even better access and faster speeds.
5G has been designed to vastly expand upon the 4G LTE technology to significantly increase storage capacity, along with boosting connection and browsing speeds.
Currently, wireless companies are mostly still in the testing and prototype stages when it comes to 5G technology. However, 5G is already being rolled out in several test cities, including Sacramento, Washington DC, Atlanta, Dallas, Miami, and New York.3
According to Verizon, when it finally materializes, 5G will provide “about 50 times the throughput of current 4G LTE, latency in the single milliseconds” and will be able to “handle exponentially more Internet-connected devices” which should “accommodate the […] explosion of the Internet of Everything”.2
5G technology is expected to have positive effects on customer support, worker productivity, and product quality. Gamers, who depend on the high-performance connections needed for gaming on mobile networks, are also going to love 5G.
5G is also likely to have a huge impact on the so-called “Internet of Things” – the network of physical devices, vehicles, and home appliances containing the electronics and software that will allow them to efficiently connect with each other, along with collecting and exchanging information.
There is no doubt that when 5G does roll out, it will lead to a dramatic surge in cell phone usage, the number of transmitters, as well as the number and variety of Internet-enabled devices.
This is very exciting from a technological standpoint, but what does 5G mean for our health and wellbeing – especially given that exposure to radiation equivalent to that of a cell phone tower has already been shown to cause cancer in mice in laboratory experiments?4
Let’s look at how 5G will be deployed to understand the effects they are likely to have on our health.
How Will 5G be Deployed?
To enable 5G deployment, wireless providers will use submillimeter and millimeter waves in frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, so that much more data can be transmitted in the same amount of time.3,5
However, these high-frequency waves can’t carry data very far. To use them, wireless companies will have to build a massive infrastructure of literally thousands of small transmitters to increase signal range and capacity. It is estimated that a transmitter will need to be placed every two to ten homes apart.3
Why should we be concerned about this?
Non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are generated by devices that emit radiofrequency radiation (RF), including cell phones, cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and even baby monitors. Electronic devices and infrastructures used to deliver electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic fields also produce EMF.
Proximity to these devices, cell phone towers, and transmitters increases our risk of adverse health effects because of EMF exposure. The massive increase in transmitters required to enable 5G deployment means that it may become impossible to avoid exposure.
Despite community protests and municipal litigation, many state governments – along with the federal government – want to allow 5G transmitters to be installed in front of homes without the consent of the owners.6
The prospect of so many transmitters emitting radiation has alarmed health experts who are rightly concerned about their potential adverse effects on our health, especially considering the preliminary findings from a federal government study.7
5G Deployment Will Lead to Higher RF Levels than with 3G & 4G
Documents show that companies are aware that deploying 5G will lead to higher levels of harmful radiofrequency radiation in the vicinity of the 5G transmitters, relative to 3G and 4G.8 According to a senior expert in the field of EMF and Health at Ericsson Research, the proposed 5G network roll-out will present difficult challenges – such as more complex EMF compliance assessments and site design requirements, along with larger EMF exclusion zones.8
Countries such as China, India, Poland, Russia, Italy, and Switzerland have lower radiation limits than the U.S. So far, they have refused to allow 5G deployment, as the accompanying increase in radiation levels would exceed those limits.
According to Ericsson, if the national EMF limit for a given country is one-tenth of the international standard limit proposed in 1998 by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)9 the size of the exclusion zone would make the roll-out “very challenging”. If the national limit was one-hundredth that of the ICNIRP limit, the size of the exclusion zone would seemingly make the 5G roll-out “a major problem or impossible”.
Will 5G Affect our Health?
Before we discuss the health ramifications of 5G, consider this: published, peer-reviewed, scientific evidence indicates that even the current wireless technologies of lead to radiofrequency exposures which pose a serious health risk to humans, animals, plants, and the environment.3
For instance, wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range have been shown to interact directly with our skin, specifically sweat glands. Our skin is our largest organ. The ICNIRP, while developing recommendations for public exposure limits, appears to be planning to classify our skin as an extremity. In other words, our skin would be categorized as belonging to our limbs rather than head or torso, permitting it to be exposed to more radiation than would otherwise be allowed.3
In her report “A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a Smart Nation or Contribute to an Unhealthy One?” Dr. Cindy Russell raises further concerns about the basic safety of currently used wireless technologies.10 She points out that the proposed 5G frequencies have not been tested for short- or long-term safety.
Based on a 1998 review of dozens of studies,11 Dr. Russell’s report explains the science behind electro-sensitivity and the biological harm caused by EMFs. It further details the many adverse effects of 5G’s frequencies – including arrhythmias, heart rate variability, bacterial effects, antibiotic resistance, immune system effects, chromatin effects, teratogenic effects, altered gene expression, and cataracts.10,11
Dr. Russell warns: “The possibility of induction of adverse health effects by a local, low-intensity MMW (millimeter wave) irradiation is of potential significance for setting health and safety standards and requires special attention.”
To protect public health, Dr. Russell recommends the following steps, among others:
- Rolling out 5G technologies only after completion of studies on their health impact
- Creating an independent, multidisciplinary agency to develop safety regulations, premarket testing, and research needs in a transparent environment with public input
- Labeling EMF information on devices along with appropriate precautionary warnings.
EMFs have also been shown to trigger oxidative stress,10 defined as an imbalance between free radicals and reactive oxygen species and their elimination by protective mechanisms, known as antioxidants. This imbalance is known to trigger many acute and chronic diseases.
The World Health Organization (WHO) currently classifies EMFs associated with RF as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”.3,5 However, according to a recent monograph published in the journal Environmental Research, mobile phone use is associated with an increased risk of brain, vestibular nerve, and salivary gland tumors, along with a possible higher risk of breast, testicular, and thyroid cancers.12
Based on this evidence, the authors of the monograph recommend that IARC’s current categorization of RFR as a possible human carcinogen should be upgraded to Carcinogenic to Humans.
EMFs can seriously compromise our health. Unfortunately, because this is the first generation that will be exposed from birth to such high levels of man-made radio frequencies, it will be years or even decades before the full health consequences are known.
For these reasons, many experts strongly recommend that research on the effects of 5G on human health be carried out and existing exposure limits be both re-examined and revised to ensure that both people and the environment are protected.
For instance, Dr. Russell calls the RF wavelengths to which we are currently exposed “a toxin to biological systems” and recommends a moratorium on 5G deployment, along with creating independent health and environmental advisory boards containing members with specific expertise in the biological effects of RF exposure.13
The National Toxicology Program Studies
The FDA nominated the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to study cell phone RF exposure because, as we have already seen, most Americans use them. Further, current safety guidelines seek only to protect users from acute injury because of the heat cell phones generate, while not much is known about the potential health effects of long-term exposure to cell phone radiation. Some human studies have shown limited evidence of an increased risk of cancer from cell phone use.
For these studies, rats were exposed to 2G and 3G frequencies of 900 and 1900 megahertz – which are currently used in voice calls and texting in the U.S. – for a total of just over 9 hours a day, for 10-minute on, 10-minute off increments. Partial findings, reported in May 2016, revealed that the brains and hearts of male rats developed low incidences of tumors.7 Tumors in other locations have been reported in both male and female rats, but these results are not yet considered conclusive.14
The complete results of these studies, expected later in 2018 or early 2019, will help the federal government better understand the health risks of exposure to cell phone radiation and are likely play an important role in determining future governmental policies regarding cell phone usage safety.
An Extraordinary Appeal
The December 2015 issue of the European Journal of Oncology contains an extraordinary document known as the “International EMF Scientist Appeal”, in which over 240 scientists from 40 nations – who are themselves actively engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing EMF – have issued a statement to the effect that that the overall weight of evidence reported in peer-reviewed, scientific studies strongly supports greater precautionary measures be taken to reduce or eliminate exposure.15
This appeal has been submitted to the UN, the WHO, and the UN Environmental Program, and to all UN Member Nations.
The opening paragraph states:
Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
According to the scientists who drafted this appeal, the agencies responsible for setting safety standards have failed 
to create and enforce proper guidelines to protect our health and wellbeing – particularly children, who are more susceptible to EMF.
For instance, in 1998 the ICNIRP published the “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz)”.9 These guidelines are accepted by the WHO and many countries. In fact, the WHO has called for all nations to adopt these guidelines to encourage global standardization of EMF safety standards.
In 2009, the ICNIRP released a statement saying that it was reaffirming its 1998 guidelines, since apparently the scientific literature published since that time “has provided no evidence of any adverse effects below the basic restrictions and does not necessitate an immediate revision of its guidance on limiting exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields”.16
Over 240 scientists who signed the appeal disagree strongly with the ICNIRP. They assert that growing scientific evidence contradicts ICNIRP’s claims – in other words, that these guidelines are insufficient to protect public health.
The WHO adopted the IARC classification of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields in 2002 and RF in 2011. According to this classification, EMF is a possible human carcinogen, as we have noted before. Despite this, the WHO maintains that there is insufficient evidence to justify lowering EMF exposure limits.
The signees of the appeal have recommended that the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) fund an independent multidisciplinary committee to explore alternative options to lower human exposure to RF and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.
The signees further state that although it is essential that the industry be involved and cooperate in this process, they should be prevented from influencing its processes or conclusions in any way.
Finally, the signees of this document have also collectively requested that steps be taken to:
- Protect children and pregnant women
- Strengthen guidelines and regulatory standards
- Encourage manufacturers to develop safer technology
- Maintain adequate power quality and ensure proper electrical wiring in utilities responsible for the generation, transmission, distribution, and monitoring of electricity to minimize harmful ground current
- Fully inform the public about the potential health risks from electromagnetic energy and teach harm reduction strategies
- Educate medical professionals about the biological effects of electromagnetic energy and train them to treat patients with electromagnetic sensitivity
- Persuade governments to fund training and research on electromagnetic fields and health independently of industry, while mandating industry cooperation with researchers
- Ensure that media disclose experts’ financial relationships with industry when citing their opinions regarding health and safety aspects of EMF emitting technologies
- Establish radiation-free areas, known as white zones.
What Can You Do to Reduce Your Exposure to EMFs and Dirty Electricity?
As we have seen, many experts are concerned about the health effects of the proposed massive increase in transmitters needed for 5G deployment and are working to protect us from their harmful effects. In the meantime, we need to protect ourselves as much as possible while we wait for existing exposure limits to be revised. Here are a few recommendations for lowering or eliminating exposure to harmful EMFs and dirty electricity:17,18
- Keep all devices in another room at night. Carry them in a bag instead of in clothing
- Try to have phone conversations on a landline instead of putting your cell phone up to your head for long periods of time
- Headphones and chargers can increase EMF exposure from cell phones – so don’t use them while they’re charging
- Avoid traditional headsets. Instead, opt for air tube headsets, which deliver great sound without EMF exposure
- Putting your cell phone on airplane mode stops connectivity with the towers, minimizing radiation exposure
- Get rid of electric blankets, waterbeds, and electric heating pads
- Use a quality shielding phone case that is designed to block various forms of radiation.
- Purchase shielded, grounded extension cords and power cords for home use
- Change your bedroom circuit breaker to exclude smoke detectors, alarms, etc. and then switch off the circuit breaker at night
- Use battery-powered alarm clocks
- Leave at least eight inches of space between your bed and your wall. Wiring (even in walls) can emit a significant magnetic field
- Position your bed so that it’s as far away as possible from strong magnetic field sources, including the utility pole, refrigerator, and home entertainment center
- Forget about Bluetooth headsets. Use speaker mode to keep your phone as far away from your body as possible
- If you’re using a laptop at home, avoid Wi-Fi and opt for hard-wired Ethernet connections
- Purchase a radio frequency meter, which will allow you to pinpoint EMF hotspots
- Reduce or eliminate dimmer switches, wireless products, printers, scanners, computers, television sets, and other energy-saving devices.
5G is truly a very scary technology, but since corporate America is free to bribe, excuse me- give HUGE donations, to our elected representatives and corporate America now controls ALL of the regulatory agencies in the US
AND 5G represents a HUGE profit potential I do not know if there is much that can be done to DEMAND INDEPENDENT safety studies BEFORE 5G is rolled out in the US.
What it may take are demonstrations such as we have not seen since the anti-war demonstrations of the 1960’s!!!!!!!!!
If the choice is my health or more advanced technology,
I CHOOSE MY HEALTH!!!!!!!!!!
Don’t worry – when the cancer wards are full, the crematoria are working round the clock and we are down to a half billion people on the planet we will get safer technologies. Without kids to leave your estate to, to governments will get it all.
#16. Reduce or eliminate… and other energy-saving devices. I do not understand this recommendation. YOu are recommending eliminating energy saving devices? What does this mean?
I have the same question. Something does not seem right about (16.). Please post a reply.
Dirty electricity is formed when the energy saving device works by interrupting the flow of electrical current. Dimmer switches actually are flickering on and off at 20,00 times per second. As do fluorescent lighting, LED light bulbs, Halogen lightbulbs and CFL lightbulbs. For more info check out the book The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMF’s by Nicolas Pineault.
Great information here. Thanks for taking the time to do, and present some valuable research information. Not long ago, our local community newspaper did a spot on this issue. People do need this information and your article here is MUCH appreciated. I will pass it on. Education and action is key.
Do you see any connection between ETFs and the fires in CA?
I was wondering this too-smart meters maybe??
D.E.W.s (Directed Energy Weapons) from above I believe were part of the cause of the Paradise fire in CA. Part of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030–population control.
HI, The article has LOTS of reference numbers, but there are NO references listed at the end of the article! Please add the references so we can do further research. Thank you for your help.
Hi Bill,
At the end of the article directly below the social media buttons (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Email) is the Sources and References tab.
Sources and Refs list IS at the end of the article. Click to open.
The in-text footnote refs are not hyperlinked
My mom and I have been trying to raise awareness and fight for our rights for the past 6 years when it comes to all this wireless technology. My son can’t go to school anymore because he gets migraines (as well as nausea and for lack of a better word, night terrors) from the exposure to the Wi Fi routers, wireless speakers for the hearing impaired, and all the laptops and cell phones they use for the lessons. The school officials have said they don’t believe that there’s an issue, that wireless radiation is safe according to Health Canada (even though my son has been diagnosed by 2 different doctors). I’m down to part time work as my body can’t handle too much exposure, and my parents and I had to sell our houses and move to a more secluded area because of the 5G going up where we were living (best thing we did though, my son hasn’t had a migraine or ‘night terrors’ since we moved here and it’s been 2 1/2 years).
I know it’s bad to say, but I can’t wait for 5G to roll out, I believe it’s going to take more and more people getting sick before anything is done. With all these smart appliances and gadgets and promoting of smart homes, I think that a lot more people are going to reach their threshold and start feeling the negative effects. Once there’s more people than not getting sick, only then will they have to acknowledge that perhaps something should be done to protect us.
I just hope the bees survive this.
I was just saying the same thing to my friend today-it may take more of us to fall ill, especially people who move in the celebrity arena before mainstream start taking any real notice.
DOn’t wish EHS on anyone but until you experience it you can’t really understand what its like.
Agree, people only care when it affects them.
I’m trying to figure out where to move to be safe from the 5G. Some cities have been successful in banning it – like Mill Vally, CA and places in Florida. I don’t know of any others. Arizona is coming out with it next year.
I agree, but unfortunately, it may end up being another “excuse” for the doctors to give those who are uneducated more meds and thus continuing to line their and the pharmaceutical companies’ pockets. Very aggravating and discouraging.
I agree Lori. But how many people will connect their being sick with the increased EMF’s and RF’s?As these waves are invisible, many people won’t recognize their influence to cause so many different types of illness, We just opted-out of having a smart electrical meter installed on our home. We were told that it was safe, although we had read otherwise. I sent this information out on our neighborhood watch and received several responses to it. Some of the others also chose to opt-out and keep there old meter. I guess that the rest assumed the electric company wouldn’t upgrade and install anything that wasn’t safe. Education is the answer. Thanks for all that you’re doing.
Ty I keep hearing about LED light bulbs emitting radio frequencies. Aren’t these harmful to to our environment?
It’s the power supply in such LED light bulbs. I’ll reply as an electronics technician, hope it will sound clear. 🙂 It’s a switch-mode power supply, like in the PC computer, but much smaller of course. Although the principal of operation is the same: switching (the internal little transformer) between taking some electricity from the grid and giving this portion of electricity (with lowered voltage) to the LED. This switching does produce an EMF but at frequencies usually from 30 to 200 kHz. This range can interfere with long wave AM radio but it’s much lesser harm as it’s not a digital data transfer only pure square-ish wave. I don’t know of body systems that would react to these wavelengths in such way that they be fooled and their function would be disturbed.
In WiFi and 5G the most harmful thing is digital-data-transfer modulation of the base signal (pure sine wave called carrier wave), because pulsed microwaves do interfere with body’s systems, mostly on a cellular level.
If you’d like to be EMF free, I’d advice buying LED light bulbs in metal casings, with shielded power supply (not in the plastic or ceramic ones). More expensive LED light bulbs also tend to have better composition of that orange-ish gel filter that makes the original blue light warm-white and the warm-white is really warm, not creepy green-ish. 😉 So the color rendering is also better. Or search for non-pulsed DC-powered LED’s: one bigger power supply shielded in a grounded metal casing and then wires with let’s say 12V DC going to rooms, kitchen, bathroom. It’s a bigger investment however. In my opinion – worth it only when a bigger renovation is planned.
Cheers!
Hi,
I find your articles very informative and fascinating. I’ve just started reading a lot of your information. I’m wondering where I can find the studies you reference using superscripts? I’d love to dig a little deeper too!
Joshua
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for reading our articles!
If you want to read our sources, please go to the sources and references tab at the end of the article!
Right here is the perfect website for anybody who wishes
to find out about this topic. You understand a whole lot its almost hard to argue with
you (not that I actually would want to…HaHa). You certainly put
a new spin on a subject that’s been discussed for many years.
Great stuff, just great!
Awesome! Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us! 🙂
This is great. Thank you for sharing.
#16. Reduce or eliminate dimmer switches, wireless products, printers, scanners, computers, television sets, and other energy-saving devices.
Now you know that people are not going to get rid of their television sets, including you. Nor will people get rid of their computers, including you. We wouldn’t even know who you are without our computers, and you make your living because we have computers. We have to print things, so need our printers. You are being totally unrealistic to even suggest that this world live without these things. Those days are long over. We aren’t going back to the horse and buggy days.
Just talking here about home use, and you certainly know that businesses these days cannot function without computers and printers.
Some of the other things you suggest are doable for most of us, some are not. Please be realistic in your suggestions, and don’t suggest that we do things that you are not doing.
This is invaluable information. I wish you would edit the article more carefully; it contains some typos that distort the meaning in critical ways. Here’s one example:
“The signees further state that although it is essential that the industry be involved and cooperate in this process, they should not be prevented from influencing its processes or conclusions in any way.”
I’m pretty sure you meant that they SHOULD be prevented from influencing. Or that they should not be ALLOWED to influence.
Thanks.
This is a good introductions to 5G, though IMHO it minimizes the dangers. Even more dangerous than the ground level transmitters are the 20,000 satellites now being put into orbit. They utilize phased array microwave focusing which allows them to send pinpoint focused mw beams to ground level at intensities far greater than even the ground level transmitters. While current 4G and WiFi can be blocked by inexpensive Faraday cages composed of aluminum or galvanized steel mosquito screen, the wavelengths of 5G eventually will be too short to be blocked by them. BTW, I have a Coronet mw meter, and (for the moment) airplane mode on Apple iPhones does turn off all mw emission from their phones.
The statement that the health effects of microwaves in the ranges of 500 MHz to 100GHz has not been adequately researched is patently untrue. There have been over 25,000 peer reviewed articles on this, as compared to, say, 10,000 articles on lead toxicity. All the articles that have not been financed, directly or indirectly, by telecommunication corporations or globalist operations, such as the World Health Organization, have indicated that they are exceedingly dangerous. Science is now indicating that chromosomes communicate via photon release and reception, and this has been an area with no publicity. 5G will have devastation effects on the ability of our DNA to communicate and regulate, and by “our,” I am referring to every living organism on the planet.
The Yellow Vests in France have disabled over half the automated vehicular ticketing monitors in a matter of weeks, and this could also be done for the ground level 5G transmitters, but satellites are a bit less accessible, as are the jets spraying toxic heavy metal oxides into the stratosphere, colloquially called Chemtrails, converting the atmosphere into an electrically conducting plasma.
Our Owners, as the late and lamented George Carlin called them, have no need any longer for the labor of the great unwashed with the rise of AI and robotics, what war criminal Henry Kissinger (unfortunately not late and will never be lamented) coined as “useless eaters.” They regard the population on the planet of over 7 billion people to be a huge danger to their hegemony, and are actively attempting to cull it. As the Georgia Guidestones has written, literally in stone in 8 languages, the ideal population of the planet is no more than 500 million people. This indicates their intension to cull 94% of the current population of useless eater, which of course does not include our Owners. 5G is only one of the weapons they are using, but one of the more dangerous ones.
A very good source for the dangers of 5G can be found on the link below. It is an audio interview with Susan Clark who was a Harvard based researcher on the subject. Only the first hour of the interview is freely available, the second being behind a subscription pay wall. But the first hour is chock full of useful information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bsq0V5ri6wk&t=4s
One can skip the first 2 minutes as it deals with the channel’s internal business.
Thanks for the link. Here’s what I recommend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfY1MWweAEM
An interview with Polish electronics engineer experienced in EMF, microwave data-transfer and its biological effects. Another huge source of precise information, yet given in an easy to understand way.
Is there an alternative to the safesleeve cases? I think in your Truth About Cancer series, you showed a type of sticker that it put on the back of the phone. Which one was that or do you just recommend safesleeve now? I personally have a safesleeve, but I can’t get any of the males in the family to use it because they say it is too bulky.
We still have the bulk of the population believing the official story of 9/11 despite the mountain of empirical evidence to the contrary, so I don’t hold out much hope for the required critical mass waking up to this issue either. It’s truly scary to think about what it will like take for true change to happen.
what about heated seats in cars, is that the same as electric blankets and such? What exactly are the risks of these things?
The first time I heard this I thought it was a bad joke or something but now that you are putting it out on your sight as well I think I want to move to another planet.where it can’t reach.
I am hearing impaired, have worn aids for years. With increasing hearing loss I am being fitted with hearing aids that transmit sound directly into my ear from my phone, via Bluetooth, I assume. Is that the same effect as pressing a cell phone close to your ear/head? I want desparatwlyntomhear phone conversations, but hate risking more EMF exposure.
Please answer quickly, as I am wearing new aids on a trial basis.
Thank you for all your work in the interest of the Planet and its people’s health! God bless you!
Hi Dana!
If your hearing aids use Bluetooth technology to transmit his phone calls, then you would be exposing yourself to electromagnetic radiation. However, the level of radiation emitted from these is quite low. It would be entirely up to your discretion to decide if you would like to keep these hearing aids. I’d recommend taking a look at this article to learn more: http://www.hearingreview.com/2017/06/wireless-hearing-aids-present-health-risk/
Hope this is helpful. Thank you for reaching out to us about this. God bless you and your family!
The 5g technology is considered the innovations of the future are coming sooner than expected. For all those people who do not know about what this type of technology is, here are some keys that will simplify and explain everything about 5G technology.
Thanks for all this. Please listen to David Icke on utube ….he has 30 years research into all this and who is behind it and the “real” motivations his book “Everything You Need to Know but have Never Been Told” …..also Barrie Trowers on utube and ex military soldier who worked with these technologies. 5G will damage DNA in cells and the blood. The 5G Internet is a Trojan horse to the evil they have further planned…. to enslave our youngs people’s minds and perceptions and society. We have 100s of young people committing suicide across the globe, a large contributer is micro wave food which causes a ‘p’ protein in the body and after a time suicide is a resulting outcome, also heavy metals in the brain. It says not to put metal in microwaves…….so guess what’s going to happen to our young people who have been over vaccinated with heavy metals(chemicals)aluminium and saturated with glysophate in foods heavy metals in the body and brain….is going to destroy the psychological health of young people; the 5G is planned to make people hooked to AI Intelligence through the cloud with stardust in foods, in tattoos, etc and then control and manipulate their perceptions, etc will be engineered by people in control rooms. This is truly and ugly indicament on society . Currently Internet is in 2.4 – 5.0 GHZ and the 5G will operate in 24 to 95 GHZ. Like living in a microwave going 24/7.